Beyond Labels 

I was watching a scene from The Breakfast Club recently. The scene where they all huddled in a corner of the detention classroom, talking about their lives and their situations. Brian asked, “Are we still going to be friends on Monday when Monday comes rolling around? Because I would feel that way about you guys.”

Claire responded quickly, “No, we wouldn’t.” When he asked why, she said, “Because the people I’m friends with would make it very difficult for me to actually want to have anything to do with you.”

That moment stuck with me. Every person in that group had their own hang-ups, their own complexities. And yet, the conversation highlighted something bigger: the way we categorize people, the labels we assign to one another, and how those labels shape our relationships and our sense of self.

It made me think a lot about my own experiences with labeling—especially in education. From a young age, we encounter categories: special education, gifted & talented, general education. I see how these labels can have long-term effects. They influence how we perceive ourselves, what we believe we are capable of, and even how we behave in the world. Labels can be incredibly limiting. They attempt to define complex, multifaceted human beings with a word or two—and no one fits neatly into a box.

I have always been resistant to labels, both for myself and for others. I’ve found them restrictive. They carry the weight of expectation and judgment, often based on someone else’s perception of what a person can or cannot do and who they are. 

Yet, I also see the other side. 

Labels can be liberating. 

They can give a person something to hold on to, a framework to understand their struggles, a way to access support, and provide a sense of belonging. They provide clarity in a confusing world, even if only temporarily.

So why do labels have to be rigid? Why can’t they be fluid, flexible, and contextual—like the evolving understanding of gender we see today, where people move beyond social definitions to embrace a spectrum of identities? Why can’t labels in education work the same way? They could reflect growth, change, and the complexity of each individual rather than freezing someone in place.

Rigid labels can limit what people believe they are capable of. Flexible labels, on the other hand, can inform, support, and empower. They can be time-bound, strengths-focused, or multi-dimensional. They can serve people instead of defining them.

Education, like life, is too complex to be reduced to a single word. Every person carries multiple talents, abilities, and potential waiting to be discovered. The challenge—and the opportunity—is to see individuals as they are: dynamic, evolving, and whole. To hold labels lightly, if at all, and never let them define the limits of a person’s life or learning.

The Breakfast Club is not just a story about teenagers in detention—it’s a reflection on how society, and especially schools, attempt  to categorize and confine human beings. But it also reminds us that our identities, our struggles, and our potentials are far richer and more complex than any label could ever capture.

At the end of the film, the students eventually return to their separate worlds. The brain, the athlete, the princess, the criminal, the basket case—each of them walks back into a system that expects them to remain exactly who they were labeled to be.

But the moment they shared in that corner of the library revealed something else entirely: that behind every label is a person far more complex than the category assigned to them.

MDE

Follow me on Substack to for insights to understand the curated ideas that shaped this piece.